PDA

View Full Version : Why do People Always Compare Foo Fighters to RHCP?


AliFooFighter
September 13th 2007, 06:16 PM
Literally, everyone ive told that im seeing the foo's in November alway says:

"Well, i still prefer the Chillis!"

I have two problems with that answer:

1. How can you prefer the Chillis to the Foo's?
2. Why? They sound nothing alike, they are just both succesful

Fender Mustang
September 13th 2007, 06:25 PM
All I know is that the bands know each other very well. Musically, the bands lead in two different directions. Although they did have a tour together back in spring 2000, I think.

Some youtube links from their tour:

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=2PYiVOlRVuI
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=vV28vHEDnA0
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=8PwaYz-01vM

02morrij
September 13th 2007, 06:34 PM
The 2 best bands in the world by a country mile. But they're way different and Foos are much better live too

Maquiladora
September 13th 2007, 07:02 PM
ahh those videos are so funny, i love them ! that chilis tour is definately when they were at their best, not that i was there, but you can easily from their off the map dvd

alvaro
September 13th 2007, 07:10 PM
Never seen anyone comparing the both of them :confused:

CalFoo
September 13th 2007, 07:19 PM
I love them both. But ive never seen anyone really compare them. Maybe mentioned in the same thread or article and they toured together blah blah blah but I unno. I dont compare them.

Frusciante for God !!

hewhoknowsall
September 13th 2007, 07:29 PM
all my friends always compare them; they say the foos suck and the chilis are so much better. I say, whatever cause everyone knows the foos are more fun. I have to admit though Flea is hilarious....

benjaminnr1
September 13th 2007, 07:37 PM
all my friends always compare them; they say the foos suck and the chilis are so much better. I say, whatever cause everyone knows the foos are more fun. I have to admit though Flea is hilarious....

Come om, Flea is just nuts, Dave is fun for real, ya know :cool:

pierre
September 13th 2007, 07:50 PM
Why do you always compare bands?

niandralades
September 13th 2007, 07:54 PM
I'm not sure why they are compared but I do know alot of chili fans who also love FF

Footernity
September 13th 2007, 07:58 PM
I'd just like to start off by saying the Foos are my favourite band by a long shot. The chilis are right up there on my list (probably 2 or 3).
That said, I think the Peppers have way more musical talent. Flea is an incredible bassist, Anthony is a better singer than Dave for sure. What separates the Foos for me is the songwriting. Fucking phenominal songwriting. I never get sick of their shit and it all strikes a chord with me like no other. And I appreciate that WAY more than, say, someone who can rip into a crazy guitar solo. Being an amazing guitarist takes practice, whereas good songwriting is god given and cannot really be explained :)

kingjojo14
September 13th 2007, 08:03 PM
beats being compared to Pearl Jam right? My theory is just that they are the only American bands that have longevity..As you all said before, there is no comparing them musically. I prefer the Foos, but im sure some think the other way. I like the CP but they are BEAT to death on rock radio (oxymoron) to the point where all their stuff sounds the same.

Kirsten
September 13th 2007, 10:31 PM
People have never EVER compared the Foo's to the Chili's.!!!

gerry_foo
September 13th 2007, 10:37 PM
This is like comparing a Carrot to a Banana... if you know what i mean!

Maquiladora
September 14th 2007, 12:52 AM
Anthony is a better singer than Dave for sure. What separates the Foos for me is the songwriting. Fucking phenominal songwriting.

well im not sure thats true about the singing. I mean Anthony couldn't even sing much, he used to just almost rap his songs until he finally tried got into his singing around BSSM album (forgive me if im wrong i read his autobiography a while ago). I think it is fair to say they have unique voices tho.

It's true both the bands' song writing is a different process, with anthony's songs primarily being about his drug experiences i think (and noobs would say dave's were about kurt. har har)

i love both of these two bands and the only way you can compare them is by saying they are both quality.

Zippy Ate My Drumkit
September 14th 2007, 12:53 AM
Do they?

Kiedis is an awful singer btw.

jakefoo
September 14th 2007, 01:04 AM
I don't hear people ever compare them... all i know is I saw the Foo open for the Peppers twice a few about 7 or 8 yrs ago and the Foo blew them off the stage. We left during the Peppers both shows.

Sideburns
September 14th 2007, 01:08 AM
Kiedis can't sing for shit, their live shows suck now, and their last two albums were just remixes of Californication and a bunch of stolen tunes. I'd never compare Foos to that.

Fooz
September 14th 2007, 01:19 AM
I don't see a real connection....Love the RHCPs, but I just naturally enjoy the Foos MUCH more. But, whatever....:p

17
September 14th 2007, 01:23 AM
Foos > > > > > > > > > > > > > RHCP.

.Milly
September 14th 2007, 03:13 AM
1. How can you prefer the Chillis to the Foo's?


Ummm because different people have different tastes?

tourettes
September 14th 2007, 03:22 AM
Early Foo >>>RHCP
Foo's Now<<<RHCP

Sideburns
September 14th 2007, 03:38 AM
Ummm because different people have different tastes?

No they don't. Stop filling her head with lies.

Liss
September 14th 2007, 03:42 AM
Literally, everyone ive told that im seeing the foo's in November alway says:

"Well, i still prefer the Chillis!"

I have two problems with that answer:

1. How can you prefer the Chillis to the Foo's?
2. Why? They sound nothing alike, they are just both succesful

Anyone who compares the two dont know their arse from their face:p

tourettes
September 14th 2007, 07:09 PM
You can compare anything.

I like ice cream cones better than desk chairs.

Fender Mustang
September 14th 2007, 07:38 PM
You can compare anything.

I like ice cream cones better than desk chairs.

..to eat? :)

lostlocke
September 14th 2007, 07:51 PM
People always seem compelled to compare things. FF kick RHCP ass though!

Tym
September 14th 2007, 08:22 PM
Anthony is a better singer than Dave for sure

You haven't seen the Chillis live, have you?

Nothing against what those guys do but Anthony Kiedis has an extremely limited vocal range and he isn't exactly pitch-perfect live.

He's not really trying to be Pavaratti anyway, but he's not as good a vocalist/singer as he is a frontman.

Footernity
September 14th 2007, 08:24 PM
Kiedis can't sing for shit, their live shows suck now, and their last two albums were just remixes of Californication and a bunch of stolen tunes. I'd never compare Foos to that.


Dave is not much better live man. Seriously. I find the albums have good singing on them but I've never been impressed by his singing live. Not that it's shit or anything, he can scream bloody murder on key, but that's pretty much the only part of his singing that impresses me.

Sideburns
September 14th 2007, 08:45 PM
Dave is not much better live man. Seriously. I find the albums have good singing on them but I've never been impressed by his singing live. Not that it's shit or anything, he can scream bloody murder on key, but that's pretty much the only part of his singing that impresses me.

Dave's voice is fine. He's no William DuVall or Scott Weiland (Weiland sings much better live than in the studio, if you can believe it), but he gets the job done and at least he can sing in key, which Kiedis can't seem to do.

lostlocke
September 14th 2007, 08:53 PM
I think Dave's voice is alright live. Sounds pretty good to me. Much better than AK

.Milly
September 14th 2007, 11:18 PM
Anthony is still a sexpot though.

17
September 14th 2007, 11:22 PM
Dave has a solid rock voice, hes not some fucking opera vocalist.

cheer up boys.
September 15th 2007, 12:47 AM
Anthony is still a sexpot though.

sho' nuff

sazzabell
September 15th 2007, 01:49 AM
I love them both - very much :o

Sophie
September 15th 2007, 02:00 AM
I've seen chilis 3 times and the foos 8. Foos win by a mile.

Keidis = fit.

Emma_Lee
September 15th 2007, 03:41 AM
you want guitar solos listen to the Chili Peppers.

BAHAHAH!
why? :rolleyes:

*waits for a postboard bashing*

Macs Power
September 15th 2007, 03:51 AM
BAHAHAH!
why? :rolleyes:

*waits for a postboard bashing*

i'll kill you! :mad:



:) daves a better singer (true fact)

Emma_Lee
September 15th 2007, 03:53 AM
i'll kill you! :mad:


i get that alot. :rolleyes:

Sideburns
September 15th 2007, 03:57 AM
I'll bash you with something, Emma. ;)

Emma_Lee
September 15th 2007, 04:06 AM
I'll bash you with something, Emma. ;)

are you coming on to me? :cool:

Sideburns
September 15th 2007, 04:13 AM
are you coming on to me? :cool:

I'll aim the other way if you'd like. :o (that was awful by even my standards :p)

Emma_Lee
September 15th 2007, 04:22 AM
I'll aim the other way if you'd like. :o (that was awful by even my standards :p)

it took me a while... but... ewwww!
lol.

Sideburns
September 15th 2007, 04:28 AM
it took me a while... but... ewwww!
lol.

If it took you that long get it, then you deserve it. :cool:

bones76
September 15th 2007, 04:33 AM
Foo's are nothing like the RHCP.. FF are a real good band and RHCP were a real good band. I'm really kind of tired of Anthony.. It's kinda old..

Emma_Lee
September 15th 2007, 04:36 AM
If it took you that long get it, then you deserve it. :cool:

how terribly rude. :p

Sideburns
September 15th 2007, 04:48 AM
theres similarities between both:

their best music is their older stuff, while they both continue to put out new records with new sounds, its still good music. but their best is their oldest. back in the day they were fun/goofy bands and even today as they get older they still make good music but also have families.

be grateful these two bands are still around today. music isnt in very good shape these days.

Music couldn't be any better these days. Velvet Revolver's finally gelled together and made a kickass fuckin record, AND they're playing GNR and STP songs, Alice in Chains is back together with a new album out next year, Dinosaur Jr.'s new album kicked my ass, and Foos made an amazing record that doesn't sound like Taylor's snare is farting every time he hits it, and the guitars sound alive. I couldn't ask for more.

Sideburns
September 15th 2007, 04:56 AM
Alot of people just aren't looking. Granted, there hasn't been a crop of new bands with the stage presence and song quality of these older ones yet. It seems like for the most part, people under 30 aren't making good music.

TecunUman
September 15th 2007, 05:05 AM
theres similarities between both:

their best music is their older stuff, while they both continue to put out new records with new sounds, its still good music. but their best is their oldest. back in the day they were fun/goofy bands and even today as they get older they still make good music but also have families.

be grateful these two bands are still around today. music isnt in very good shape these days.

What do you mean music isn't in very good shape these days?!!? Didn't you see the VMA's? Britney is to music what an ice cold beer is to someone who's been stranded in the desert for a week. Let's not even talk about all the excellent talent that's come out of American Idol the last couple of years. No, let's talk about AI. With the fine nurturing of Simon, Paula & Randy, music's future looks bright & sunny. How dare you comment on the present state of music?

;) Ha!! I'm about to nail my hands to the sides of my head for typing up such garbage.
I agree with the quote above. We should all be thankful for bands that persevere and continue to make good music. Because of bands like the Foo's we are able to look forward to new album releases. Yet we have the older songs to take a stroll down memory lane and remember the good times we had when we first heard those sounds. Enjoy the present, smile and remember the past, and look forward and pray for an even better future!